<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>The Search Engine Blog &#187; Picturesque</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/author/picturesque/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com</link>
	<description>News and Tips From The Search Marketing World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:17:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9; </copyright>
		<managingEditor>info@thesearchengineblog.com ()</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>info@thesearchengineblog.com()</webMaster>
		<category>Internet Marketing</category>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>News and Tips From The Search Marketing World</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author></itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name></itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>info@thesearchengineblog.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>Bing on Yahoo!</title>
		<link>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/bing-on-yahoo/2010/07/21/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/bing-on-yahoo/2010/07/21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Picturesque</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/bing-on-yahoo/2010/07/21/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo! is showing Bing results 25% of the time. Searching at Yahoo! will show the Yahoo! logo, but will give you Bing search results. The merger is in full swing. Webmaster tools at Bing are also changing and it&#8217;s hoped that some missing features will be replaced with some Yahoo! technology. Yahoo! Search Blog » [...]<p>Read more articles like this one at <a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com">The Search Engine Blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/bing-on-yahoo/2010/07/21/">Bing on Yahoo!</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/bing-on-yahoo/2010/07/21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inflated Links are Accurate</title>
		<link>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/inflated-links-are-accurate/2010/07/01/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/inflated-links-are-accurate/2010/07/01/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Picturesque</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/inflated-links-are-accurate/2010/07/01/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When can you rely on statistics? Never. It appears that the Google links bug isn&#8217;t a bug. They are stating the numbers are accurate because they are now showing more data. So were the figures prior to this a bug? It reinforces my position that watching trends in reporting is far more important. Is Link [...]<p>Read more articles like this one at <a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com">The Search Engine Blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/inflated-links-are-accurate/2010/07/01/">Inflated Links are Accurate</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/inflated-links-are-accurate/2010/07/01/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inflated Link Counts</title>
		<link>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/inflated-link-counts/2010/06/29/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/inflated-link-counts/2010/06/29/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Picturesque</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/inflated-link-counts/2010/06/29/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Webmaster Tools is showing inflated link counts for many users. Double check your figures before heading off to that board meeting. Discussion at Google&#8230;. Is Link to Your Sites in Webmaster, reporting links with a Bug ? &#8211; Webmaster Central Help Read more articles like this one at The Search Engine BlogInflated Link Counts<p>Read more articles like this one at <a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com">The Search Engine Blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/inflated-link-counts/2010/06/29/">Inflated Link Counts</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/inflated-link-counts/2010/06/29/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Continued Google Tweaking</title>
		<link>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/continued-google-tweaking/2010/06/25/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/continued-google-tweaking/2010/06/25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Picturesque</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/continued-google-tweaking/2010/06/25/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you noticed continued Google May Day updates? Many have and there is a discussion here&#8230;.Google Updates and SERP Changes &#8211; June 2010 Read more articles like this one at The Search Engine BlogContinued Google Tweaking<p>Read more articles like this one at <a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com">The Search Engine Blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/continued-google-tweaking/2010/06/25/">Continued Google Tweaking</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/continued-google-tweaking/2010/06/25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Suggest Corrects Spelling</title>
		<link>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-suggest-corrects-spelling/2010/06/07/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-suggest-corrects-spelling/2010/06/07/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Picturesque</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-suggest-corrects-spelling/2010/06/07/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#8217;t spell worth a darn? Now when you search in Google, it will suggest the correct spelling in the pull down that shows suggested searches. You don&#8217;t need to wait for a page to load to see the correct spelling. Students need not use a dictionary anymore. Computers will continue to think for you. Personally [...]<p>Read more articles like this one at <a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com">The Search Engine Blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-suggest-corrects-spelling/2010/06/07/">Google Suggest Corrects Spelling</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-suggest-corrects-spelling/2010/06/07/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Increases Title Tags?</title>
		<link>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-increases-title-tags/2010/06/01/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-increases-title-tags/2010/06/01/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 01:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Picturesque</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-increases-title-tags/2010/06/01/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google seems to be allowing 70 characters for title tags, up from 66. This is the blue clickable link that shows in most search results. What will you do with your four extra characters? Length Title tag has grown Read more articles like this one at The Search Engine BlogGoogle Increases Title Tags?<p>Read more articles like this one at <a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com">The Search Engine Blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-increases-title-tags/2010/06/01/">Google Increases Title Tags?</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-increases-title-tags/2010/06/01/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Traffic Down? You Aren&#8217;t Alone.</title>
		<link>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-traffic-down-you-arent-alone/2010/05/11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-traffic-down-you-arent-alone/2010/05/11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 18:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Picturesque</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-traffic-down-you-arent-alone/2010/05/11/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Google redesign has a large number of webmasters complaining about serious losses in traffic. You may have noticed the new logo, but poke about and you&#8217;ll see a lot of other changes. What else changed under the hood that could impact traffic? Time will tell. Google Referrals Way Down Since the SERP LayOut [...]<p>Read more articles like this one at <a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com">The Search Engine Blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-traffic-down-you-arent-alone/2010/05/11/">Google Traffic Down? You Aren&#8217;t Alone.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-traffic-down-you-arent-alone/2010/05/11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google MAYDAY Updates</title>
		<link>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-mayday-updates/2010/05/03/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-mayday-updates/2010/05/03/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 18:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Picturesque</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-mayday-updates/2010/05/03/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A number of sites are crying MayDay as their long tail keywords traffic falls during Google&#8217;s latest updates. Of course someone must be doing better to fill that void. Funny how they aren&#8217;t complaining. Long tail searches are searches four or more words long. Fat belly are two to three words. Now you&#8217;ll be able [...]<p>Read more articles like this one at <a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com">The Search Engine Blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-mayday-updates/2010/05/03/">Google MAYDAY Updates</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-mayday-updates/2010/05/03/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google on Caffiene Dance</title>
		<link>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-on-caffiene-dance/2010/04/23/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-on-caffiene-dance/2010/04/23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Picturesque</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-on-caffiene-dance/2010/04/23/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bring on the doom and gloom soothsayers. Many webmasters are claiming that they are seeing the Google caffeine update on about 80% of Google&#8217;s datacenters. Whether it is an update or not, there are definite changes going on in the Google indexes and it is affecting site rankings. Google Updates and SERP Changes &#8211; April [...]<p>Read more articles like this one at <a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com">The Search Engine Blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-on-caffiene-dance/2010/04/23/">Google on Caffiene Dance</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/google-on-caffiene-dance/2010/04/23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Funnel Those Adwords</title>
		<link>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/funnel-those-adwords/2010/03/24/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/funnel-those-adwords/2010/03/24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Picturesque</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/funnel-those-adwords/2010/03/24/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search funnels is an analytic tool Google has implemented that will help show adwords traffic in ways you couldn&#8217;t before. If someone searches and clicks on an ad to your site, reads it and then leaves, it shows no conversion. That&#8217;s accurate so far. Let&#8217;s say they return to your site via a different ad. [...]<p>Read more articles like this one at <a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com">The Search Engine Blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/funnel-those-adwords/2010/03/24/">Funnel Those Adwords</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thesearchengineblog.com/funnel-those-adwords/2010/03/24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
